Review of the textbook: types, sample text, spelling instructions, plan, main idea and sample reviews

A review of a teaching aid is a mandatory element for approving a development. What are the features of its writing? Let us analyze some features and elements that should be included in it. Here are a few examples of ready-made analyzes of various materials to give an idea of ​​the structure of writing reviews, those elements that must be marked in them.

tutorial review sample

Methodological features

The review of the study guide, a sample of which will be presented below, is an assessment of an art, scientific, other work with its detailed analysis.

It consists of three parts: the introductory part, the main material, the final material.

In each part, it is assumed that positive and negative points are considered. The review of the manual ends with conclusions, wishes, recommendations. In addition to the general conclusions made by the reviewer within the framework of the considered material, some recommendations and additions may be presented.

review of teaching aids for pedagogy

Subject of analysis

It is necessary to determine the genre of peer-reviewed work (program, manual, development). There are certain templates that may include a review of a workbook. For example, you can start with the following phrases:

  • peer-reviewed material is ...;
  • the benefit in question can be considered as ...

Depending on what subject area is represented in the peer-reviewed work, phrases related to the direction in question can be added.

Relevance of the material

The review of the manual should reflect its relevance, importance, timeliness. For example, it can be noted that the work is devoted to the topic of household waste recycling, which has become topical in our day and needs urgent consideration.

A review of a manuscript of a training manual devoted to innovative methods of working with talented youth, for example, involves indicating the importance of early identification of gifted children, building individual developmental trajectories for them.

study guide manuscript review

Work structure

Also, a review of a study guide involves an analysis of the author's observance of the work structure, that is, the correct construction, the consistency of the material. The reviewer notes a similar fact, highlighting the components of the material presented, the logic of the transition, the use of ligaments. The following is a summary of the manual, distinguishing elements are highlighted.

Two to three sentences reveal the content of each part. The reviewer notes the central issues of the work, identifies key phrases that distinguish material from similar developments.

The author’s merit is highlighted, for example, the systematization of material relating to the analysis of the solution of olympiad problems in chemistry.

How to get a review of the study

Analysis results

A review of a textbook on physics involves indicating the practical value of the material created, identifying the main shortcomings. For example, you can start this section with the words: “Among the shortcomings of the manual presented for review, it is necessary to mention the lack of systematic results of its testing in the mainstream school”.

Next, the results are summarized, in which the assessment is noted that the work in question deserves. Be sure to review the study guide, a sample of which is presented below, supplemented by the wishes of the author. Next, the date of writing the review, information about the reviewer, his position. Mandatory is the certification of the material by the seal of the educational institution where the reviewer officially works.

review of teaching aids

Review option for the Genetics medical allowance

Educational visual aid, the review of which is presented in the example, was created by the teacher of the Volgograd Medical College O. Ermolova. The material is a manual for students of the medical college in genetics. It presents questions for independent training of future doctors. The peer-reviewed material also presents the theoretical part necessary for solving problems.

What else can a tutorial review include? The text that the author has selected for the tasks is useful and relevant. Particular attention is paid to reference material on genetics. The work is devoted to the urgent topic of our time, because the subject of “medical genetics” involves the formation of practical skills among students in solving genetics problems in the framework of practical and independent work.

This manual contains four sections, a literature list, a dictionary of genetic terms.

A review of the teaching aid, a sample of which is proposed, involves a brief description of all sections.

The first section contains problems in molecular biology. Examples of typical tasks are presented, exercises and questions for independent preparation are offered.

The second section provides general recommendations for solving genetic tasks and test questions for introspection.

The third section of the manual in brief form tells about the twin method of analysis of human heredity. It also presents tasks on this issue.

The fourth section deals with the solution of exercises and assignments on the issue of hereditary diseases. The author presents assignments for pedigrees, the rules for their compilation are indicated.

The main advantage of the peer-reviewed material is the selection by the author of qualitative definitions, clearly formulated tasks and exercises, allowing to develop the practical skills of future medical workers.

The manual is timely and relevant in content, available on the presentation of the material. Also, among the advantages of the reviewed collection, it is necessary to highlight the consistency of the theoretical material chosen by the author.

We recommend the collection for students of medical colleges in the subject "Medical Genetics".

Next is the date of writing, the signature of the reviewer, the position he occupies, the seal of the organization in which he works is put.

review of teaching aids

Features of the review of pedagogical manuals

In connection with the reform of domestic education, a need arose to develop new teaching and methodological materials, according to which teachers could plan their professional activities and fully fulfill the state order. How is the review of the educational-methodical manual on pedagogy compiled? Its structure is classical, contains an introduction, a substantive part, conclusions, conclusions about the significance of the considered material, recommendations to the author.

We propose a review written on the material “Solving design problems in chemistry for the derivation of formulas of organic compounds”. The author took up a relevant and timely topic, since this type of task is included in the questions of the unified state exam in chemistry in high school. It is the tasks of deriving the formulas of organic compounds from various initial data that cause the greatest difficulties for future physicians and oil workers.

A review of a textbook, an example of which is considered, involves the allocation of its distinctive parameters.

The author of the material paid attention to the algorithm of actions in solving problems, proposed universal methods for this type of calculation tasks.

We recommend material for work to school chemistry teachers, high school students who are preparing to pass a unified state exam in this academic discipline.

Foreign Language Review

The structure of the analysis of the new manual in a foreign language is used the same as for the remaining subject areas. What does a review of a study guide in English include? First, the reviewer indicates the subject of analysis, notes the relevance of the material presented.

Next, innovative approaches and techniques found by the author are revealed. For example, the manual provides detailed methods for teaching students transcription. The reviewer notes the possibility of practical application of the material, the possibility of broadcasting it to other educational institutions.

features of writing reviews

Review of the training manual for the exam and the exam

After a serious reform was carried out in Russian education, there was a need to create teaching aids that would help school teachers prepare their pupils for successfully passing final exams in primary and secondary schools.

We offer a fragment of a review written in a manual designed to prepare ninth-graders for passing the OGE in physics.

The material "Preparation for the test part of the OGE in physics" is a relevant and timely material, which is intended for independent preparation of students for the final exam in physics. The manual contains three sections on mechanics, optics, and electricity.

Distinctive parameters of the analyzed material is a selection of theoretical material, support of its typical disassembled tasks. The author included in his manual tasks that were offered in test versions of the final certification in physics in 9 classes in previous years.

We recommend the analyzed material not only for the work of school physics teachers, but also for schoolchildren for independent preparation for the exam.

Manual "Training on conflict resolution"

A similar toolkit is a resource tool. It presents a training program. They have a logical system of five consecutive elements.

The author managed to select the material so that each new module was a continuation of the previous material, complementing and expanding experience, skills, attitudes and knowledge. The aim of the peer-reviewed manual is to achieve certain pedagogical skills and techniques through role-playing games, exercises, discussions, lecture classes. The classes listed in the manual enable the trainer and psychologist to work more efficiently and professionally.

The manual in question is of interest to teachers of higher educational institutions in psychology and pedagogy, trainers, students who want to improve their qualifications in the field of psychology.

To summarize

Regardless of the field of scientific knowledge, any manual, methodological collection, offered for wide use, should have a professional review. The reviewer is professors, doctors and candidates of sciences in the areas covered in the manual. There are certain rules and requirements for writing reviews. First, the name of the material in question is indicated, then its relevance is highlighted. Next, the main sections are highlighted, each of them is briefly analyzed. In the final part, the author’s work is summarized, conclusions are formulated on the basis of the above material of the manual.

For example, we can note the full compliance of the material under consideration with the age characteristics of students, the requirements of the federal state educational standard (GEF).

Basically, the review of the analyzed textbook is compiled in an arbitrary form. Nevertheless, it is desirable to comply with the basic rules that are presented to this document. For example, it is necessary to maintain the recommended volume, size and font, scientific style.

The review should convey not only the thoughts and ideas of the author, but also specific additions of the reviewer, demonstrate his attitude to the problem under consideration, have a reasoned assessment, conclusions, demonstrate the relevance and feasibility of this methodological manual.

Before you start writing a review on a specific teaching aid, you must specify the name of the book, information about the author. Only then can we proceed to a detailed description of the material presented in the manual.

It is necessary to indicate the conformity of the theoretical and practical material presented in the manual, age features, state standards. The reviewer should also note the compliance of the content and structure of the manual with the requirements and GOST standards.

The manual is relevant in the case when the material is built in it logically, interconnected, fully.

Before starting to write the manual, the author must select such material that would fully contribute to the formation of certain skills among pupils or students for whom the manual will be created.

The reviewer, studying the finished material, pays attention to the rationality of selecting tasks for independent work. In order for the manual to be recommended for use in educational organizations, it should have only positive reviews.

Source: https://habr.com/ru/post/A5623/


All Articles