Bookmakers allow the player to win money at sports events. But only a few manage to earn a huge amount, as knowledge in sports and the ability to think analytically are not available to everyone. Then users try to resort to the help of cappers or people who know how to beat the bookmaker. One of the leading places is occupied by forecaster Alvin Almazov. But is a capper strategy so good?
Almazov project
Alvin Almazov is a person who earns money at bookmakers. Capper offers its users free predictions for sporting events. Almazov has his own group "Vkontakte" and "Twitter", as well as an information site.
On the site of Alvin Almazov, you can find information about the upcoming match, read the forecast. Capper describes sports events, analyzes the latest games. The site offers a choice of players a huge number of expected outcomes of events. The average ratio is 1.8. But one can also come across a forecast with higher statistics: a coefficient above 3.
Interesting! The project of Alvin Almazov is mainly aimed at football. A bet is recommended on total goals.
Paid forecast cost
Along with free data, Alvin Almazov gives predictions for football and on a paid basis. For his services and analytical work, the capper set the amount:
- Premium forecast - 799 rubles.
- 3-day access to paid forecasts - 2049 rubles.
- 3 days of paid forecasts and premium rate - 2799 rubles.
- VIP forecast in conjunction with a premium rate - 999 rubles.
But no one forces players to use paid services. Gives Alvin Diamonds and free predictions for sports. But the coefficient of such a rate will be an order of magnitude lower.
Reviews
Prices for Alvin’s paid forecasts are low. And bettors, trying to make money on bookmakers, are increasingly resorting to the services of a capper. But, according to customer reviews, the percentage of victory for the free prediction is not higher than 50. If the choice falls on the victory of one or the second team, then according to the logic of things, the BC player has a 50% chance of winning. So is it worth considering Alvin Almazov’s opinions when choosing a team to win?
A significant plus on the Almazov website is information about the work of bookmakers. The visitor can immediately read about rates, game methods. Also on the site there is just a huge amount of free forecasts. The average ratio is 1.8. It turns out that Alvin watches sports events and chooses low odds for a free forecast? But bookmakers say: the lower the odds, the higher the chance of winning.
On the network you can read a lot of negative reviews about the work of Alvin Almazov. A significant portion of subscribers lost their funds on free forecasts. The capper either does not respond to personal messages, or answers in a rude manner.
Players complain that Alvin Almazov’s losing predictions disappear from his information resource. Indeed, the capper does not give any guarantees. Neither the site, nor the Almazov group have screenshots with worked bets. And to fix the post and correct the statistics is not so difficult when it comes to textual information. And forecasts are aimed not at quality, but at their quantity.
Paid Forecast Statistics
Alvin Almazov claims that patency of the paid forecast is 65-70%, and the coefficient is around 2. But is this really so? Users of the BC who have encountered the work of a capper argue that the passability of rates is much lower. Although, a negative review does not have any confirmation with a screenshot.
But it is worth stopping at one more moment. The free forecast coefficient is 1.8 on average, and the paid one is 2. Does it make sense to pay money for the same coefficient?
Players of bookmakers should remember that only 6-7% of all players in any BC can earn on bets. All the rest, at best, remain with their money. And free forecasters mainly earn on sales of forecasts and the affiliate program of the same BC. Bookmakers pay 20% of their referral earnings. Maybe that's why there is an advertisement for bookmakers on the site and the Almazov group?
Summary
Almazov’s work is not confirmed by anything. Neither the site nor the VK group has a photograph of him. All that users can "enjoy" is a dry text about the victory of a team. It may be more useful and easier to listen to folk wisdom: "Listen to everyone, but do it your own way?"