Before publication in various scientific journals, an article must be reviewed. This is an important step in the selection and approval of articles for print. Often, together with a review, they can request an extract recommending the article for publication from the protocol of the department meeting . Therefore, the work of the reviewer should be approached very responsibly.
What is a review of an article?
Consider this in more detail. First you need to understand what a review of a scientific article is. Despite some vague term, the meaning of this procedure is quite simple. In the process of reviewing the article, it is carefully checked in terms of design, that is, it examines the structure, the presence of the necessary elements, the amount of work, the correct design of links, bibliographic data and content, where the consistency of information, its reliability and validity are evaluated. However, behind the seeming at first glance simplicity of the process is the subjective opinion of the reviewer. For this reason, when preparing an article for printing, one should take into account not only objectively formal requirements, but also try to see the article from the point of view of the reviewer. In addition, you should have a clear idea of what must certainly be reflected and how exactly the review of the article is drawn up. This information may be needed not only when working on an article, but also when preparing a review for your colleague’s article.
The review of the article is a special document drawn up on behalf of the reviewer, which can be a person with a scientific rank and academic degree in the specialty corresponding to the topic of scientific work. The reviewer analyzes the peer-reviewed text, evaluates the criteria for design and content, that is, evaluates its volume, verifies the correctness of the compilation of the annotation, the design of bibliographic links, the selection of keywords, establishes the relevance of the topic of specialization of the scientific publication. The reviewer also evaluates the novelty, significance, scientific value of your article and draws conclusions about the advisability of publication in a scientific publication or the need for its refinement in accordance with the noted remarks. The completed review of the article is signed by the reviewer and then certified by the seal of the organization in which the reviewer works. A copy sent by e-mail is not considered a full-fledged document, for this reason the original review should be sent by mail to the editorial office.
How is it made out?
The review of the article, as well as the application for publication and the article itself, must be executed in accordance with strictly defined rules. Peer review of the article is a mandatory procedure, which serves as a kind of filter for material received by the editor. Often, the fact depends on this whether the material will be published or not. The review should include the following information: full name of the scientific work, surname, name, patronymic of the author, position, brief description of the problem that was raised, relevance of the study, the most important aspects disclosed in the work, recommendation for publication of articles in the scientific journal, surname, name Reviewer's middle name, his place of work, academic title, academic degree, position, signature.
The optimal review should be approximately three and a half to four thousand characters, taking into account spaces, that is, about 1.5-2 pages in .doc format in 12 pt Times New Roman font. To give it a stylistic completeness, it is recommended to use specialized phrases and expressions that emphasize the high professional level and literacy of the peer review.