The system of training schoolchildren and philology students involves the study of the course "Morphology". In practical classes in the Russian language, in studying this course, much attention is paid to the morphological analysis of parts of speech.
It is especially useful to focus especially on the morphological analysis of the participle, because many people make mistakes related to the complexity of theoretical material on the subject.
Carrying out the morphological analysis of the sacrament, it is necessary to remember the following:
1. The participle of the sentence should be written out with the word on which it is dependent. Thanks to this, the number, gender and case are correctly determined. If a morphological analysis of the short participle is performed , then it should be written out with the subject.
2. The participles must be distinguished from adjectives that have passed into the participles. The analysis of such adjective names is made out as follows:
Abandoned (homestead) - an adjective formed from the sacrament.
3. For communion, two attributes that are “borrowed” from the verb are constant — the form and the tense. Transition does not indicate.
4. When determining the type of participle, one must rely on the knowledge of suffixes that are specific to the participles of each type.
The real participle in the present tense is formed from the verb I of the conjugation of the imperfect form of the present tense, using the suffixes -us (s), as well as from the verb II of the conjugation with the suffixes -sent (s): laughing, sitting.
The real participle in the past tense is formed from the verb of the past tense, using the suffixes -vsh (-sh): stuck, broken.
Passive participle in the present tense is formed from the verb of the imperfect present tense by means of the suffixes -om (-em) (for verbs of the I conjugation) and -im (for the verbs of the II conjugation): readable, audible.
Passive participle in the past tense is formed from the verb of the past tense by means of the suffixes -, - (-), -. In full passive participles, –nn is written, in brief –n: upset, thrown out, drunk.
5. For the correct allocation of participles, the semantic principle of distinguishing them is no less important:
a) one can compare the participles with the verb: a luminous lamp is one that shines; a flying plane is one that flies;
b) sometimes you can ask a question that combines the semantic questions of the participle and the verb: what is he doing? What did you do?
6. Non-constant signs of participles coincide with signs of adjectives. The gender of participles is not indicated in the plural.
Morphological analysis of the sacrament:
1. Name the part of speech and indicate its general grammatical meaning.
2. List the morphological features:
- indicate the initial form (nominative, masculine, singular);
- What are the permanent signs (passive or real, kind, time);
- indicate inconsistent signs (short or full form, number, gender, case).
3. Indicate what syntactic role the participle plays in the sentence.
Written morphological analysis of the sacrament:
The brilliant bell tower of a tattered church stood out against the sky.
Unfurled (church)
1. Church (which?) Torn apart - reason.
2. N.f. - scattered. Fasting: suffering., Etc., perfect. view. Unposted: full f., one hours, wives genus.
3. Church (which one?) Disfigured.
Oral morphological analysis of the sacrament:
Disordered (church) - this is the sacrament.
Firstly, it denotes a sign of an object by its action (the church that was turned around), formed from the verb to turn around. The initial form is scattered.
Secondly, it has constant signs: a passive, past tense, perfect look. The sentence is consistent with the word church and is used in full form; singular, feminine are its inconsistent attributes.
Thirdly, in the sentence acts as a definition.