The term "participle" appeared in the 17th century and is composed of two parts (deu + participle). This is a form of the verb, calling in the sentence a secondary additive action. According to grammatical signs, it is very similar to an adverb, because it does not change. The morphological analysis of the participles is to indicate only permanent signs, it does not have inconstant .
Morphological analysis of the participle
1. Name the part of speech, indicate the general grammatical meaning.
2. List the morphological features:
- indicate the initial form (indefinite form of the verb);
- repayment;
- view;
- transitivity;
- immutability.
3. Determine what syntactic role in the sentence performs.
Note!
Sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between the sacraments and the participles. To cope with this, you need to understand that the participle, gerimony and verb are verb forms, and therefore, are associated with the meaning of the action. First of all, questions will help to distinguish them. Conjugate forms of the verb answer the following: “What am I doing?”, “What will I do?”, “What have I done?”, “What have I done?”, “What are you doing?”, “What are you doing?” other. To the participle question may be asked "what are you doing?" or “what having done?”, as well as semantic, syntactic, helping to determine its role in the sentence: “how?”, “when?”, “why?”. For example: Stomp, holding hands around the fire (stomp like?). After completing the exercise, the guys raised their hands (raised when?). Sick, I went to the hospital (went when?).
To the sacrament, you can ask the question “what is he doing?”, “What has he done?”, “What has he done?”.
Also, when distinguishing between participles and participles, suffixes help:
- the participle of the imperfect form is formed from the stem of the present tense verb with the suffix -a, (-s): read - read, live - live;
- the participle of the perfect form is formed from the base of the infinitive of the perfect type with the suffix -in, -lice, -shi: do - do, do, do, fall - fall, fall.
In addition, when performing a morphological analysis of germs, it is necessary to indicate its return: return (with a postfix -s, -s) and irrevocable (without such).
Single adverbs sometimes lose the verb and pass into the category of adverbs. In this case, the former participles no longer indicate an additional action (they are not replaced by verb forms, do not answer the questions “what have you done?”, “What are you doing?”), But only indicate a sign of action and answer the question “how?”. For example: The guys silently listened to me (listened to how? - silently, this is an adverb, and not participle).
Morphological analysis is performed necessarily in the context, writing out the participle together with the verb, the additional action of which it means.
Written morphological analysis of the participle
Pyatak, ringing and bouncing, rolled down the road.
Ringing (rolled)
1. The ring is depr.
2. Rolled (how? What doing?) Ringing. N.f. - ring.
Morph. signs: nesov. century., irrevocable, imper., unchanged.
3. (How? What are you doing?) Ringing.
Bouncing (rolled)
1. Bouncing - deepr.
2. Rolled (like? What, doing?) Bouncing. N.f. - bounce.
Morph. signs: nesov. century., irrevocable, imper., unchanged.
3. (How? What are you doing?) Bouncing.
Oral morphological analysis of the participle
Ringing (rolled)
1. The link is the participle, denotes a secondary effect.
2. Rolled (how? What doing?) Ringing. The initial form is ringing.
Morphological features: imperfect form, irrevocable, intransitive, unchanging verb form.
3. The sentence fulfills the syntactic role of circumstances.
Bouncing (rolled)
1. Bouncing - participle means a secondary action.
2. Rolled (like? What, doing?) Bouncing. The initial form is to bounce.
Morphological features: imperfect form, irrevocable, intransitive, unchanging verb form.
3. The sentence fulfills the syntactic role of circumstances.