Everyone knows how mysterious and difficult to learn our Russian language is. A huge number of parts of speech and their various forms "dwells" in it. Short and complete participles are particularly complex. The distinguishing features of these verb forms will be considered in more detail.
Features
Linguists have not yet decided which place in morphology to give to the sacraments. The authors of Russian language textbooks have a completely different attitude to this issue. Some argue that it is only a form of the verb, which expresses not only the action, but also its attribute. Others say that it is completely independent and attribute it to parts of speech. But one thing is known: short and complete participles are simply irreplaceable for our speech. Without them, we will endlessly use the word “which”. For instance:
A singing person is a person who sings.
A sick child is a child who is sick.
The work done is the work that has been done.
Carrying various dependent words, the sacrament is part of the sacrament that decorates our speech.
For example: A wind blowing from the sea refreshed my face.
Full form
One of the features of this part of speech is the ability to form. More than adjectives, it is not subject to any part of speech.
The full and short form of the participles differ both grammatically and syntactically. How not to mix them up? The full form is called passive participles, which usually answer the question “what”. They are called suffering because in their meaning they assume an action performed by someone.
From actual participles , it is impossible to form short ones.
Example: Acquired - acquired, resolved - resolved.
Brief and complete passive participles perform different syntactic functions. All because they have different goals. The full form, answering the question “what”, is a definition. This is her main resemblance to the name adjective.
Therefore, the participle included in the turnover is usually called a separate definition.
Do not forget about punctuation marks. If the participle turnover, which includes only full forms, is after the word being defined, then in this case, commas must be placed on both sides.
The forest, shrouded in haze, is very beautiful.
If the turnover goes after the main word, then in this situation the commas are not put in any case: The work done on time was approved .
Short form
As we were able to find out, short and full participles are in many respects similar, but they play different roles in sentences.
This form is formed by cutting off the endings from the complete one and attaching other endings: completed - completed (removed the –th and part of the suffix, adding –a).
Consider the offer: The trip was paid. The short form of full participle “paid” is no longer a characteristic of an attribute in action. Now she herself shows the process, being part of the predicate. Thus, the short form acts as the main member of the proposal.
The main feature is that short and full participles can vary by birth. Written - written, laid - laid, lost - lost .
Distinguishing them is not so difficult. A correctly asked question for the sacrament will help to easily distinguish the short form from the full one.