Carrying out the analysis (Lermontov's “Demon”), it should first be noted that this work of the poet is still considered one of the most controversial, mysterious and deep in the works of Mikhail Yurievich. The whole difficulty lies in the fact that the poem can be analyzed from different angles: cosmic, which is represented by the attitude of the Demon towards God and the Universe, psychological and even philosophical. Lermontov was not the first person who in his works addressed the image of a fallen angel who declared war on God. Before him, this topic was interpreted differently by Goethe (Faust), and Byron (Cain), and, of course, Milton (Lost Paradise).
The image of the Demon in the poem of Lermontov
Analysis: Lermontov’s “Demon” is notable primarily for the fact that the author unusually approached the plot of the poem and the image of the key image. Lermontov Demon is an amazing combination of tremendous inner strength, the desire to get rid of the oppressive feeling of loneliness, the desire to join the good and the tragic powerlessness associated with the inability to achieve the desired. To the reader, the Demon appears to be a sort of rebellious Protestant who opposed himself not only to God, but also to the whole world, to all people.
The main character is the “king of knowledge and freedom,” who rebels against everything that fetters the mind. The demon in Lermontov’s poem rejects a world in which there is no true happiness, where people are equally afraid of both love and hate, are constantly in the grip of worldly passions. However, this global denial demonstrates not only the strength of the Demon, but also its weakness. Indeed, from the heights of the endless expanses of outer space, he is simply unable to see and appreciate all the charm of earthly nature.
Arrogant solitude weighs on the Demon, he often yearns for communication with people and the world. “Living for himself” is disgusted with him, and out of the prison of gloomy loneliness he sees love for a simple girl Tamara. However, for him, the search for beauty, harmony, love and kindness remains unattainable.
Philosophical questions raised in the work
The analysis (Lermontov's “Demon”) is somewhat difficult to carry out, because the author refrained from expressing his personal position, allowing the work to live its own life, to be ambiguous. The exposure of individualistic thinking outlined in earlier poems is also present in The Demon. The destructive principle of Mikhail Yuryevich is interpreted as anti-humanistic. However, at the same time, some of the questions posed in the “Demon” remain unresolved. For example, it remains unclear who the poet sees in his Demon - the bearer of evil (albeit suffering) or the victim of injustice? Why was Tamara’s soul saved - simply for the sake of strict censorship of that time, or was it just such a denouement that was conceived from the very beginning as an inevitable ideological move? Is the ending of the work and the defeat of the Demon conciliatory or not? Analysis (Lermontov's “Demon”) centers around these and many other issues. Which, by the way, are the most convincing evidence of the high philosophical load of the work. The dialectical combination of "good" and "evil" in the poem, a colorful image of the thirst for the ideal and its loss, hostility towards the world and the desire to reconcile with it - all these themes permeate the poem with a red thread, making it a truly unique work.
Artistic techniques in the poem "Demon"
An analysis of the poem “Demon” by Lermontov is also an appeal to its artistic originality. Being a colorful example of romanticism, the work is almost entirely based on antitheses. Heroes are constantly opposed to each other: these are images of the Demon and God (earth and sky), the Demon and the Angel (death and life), Tamara and the Demon (reality and ideal). Present in the creation of the poet and contrasting with each other ethical and social categories. Affirmation and denial, harmony and struggle, good and evil, hatred and love, tyranny and freedom - in “Demon” these contradictory concepts literally clashed with each other.
Conclusion
What so attracted the attention of readers to the poem of Lermontov? The “Demon” we are analyzing is a work that combines powerful poetic fantasy, the pathos of doubt and negation, the poet’s unique lyricism, mystery, simplicity and comprehensibility of the presentation.
Against the background of all this, important philosophical and moral questions are asked to readers and the whole world, to which humanity has been searching for answers for millennia.