What is participle circulation? What punctuation marks are used in the letter to highlight the sacramental turnover? What is the role of the participles in the proposal? In this article we will analyze these questions, and also answer questions about when it is necessary to isolate such constructions, and when this should not be done. Of course, in the course of the article we will analyze the corresponding examples.
Introduction
Clerical circulation, punctuation marks in clerical circulation have long become an integral part of the study of the Russian language program, which they begin to go through in high school. So, what is the ad-communion turnover?
The participle circulation is called nothing more than the participle, which has dependent words with it. A separate circumstance can also be expressed in this way.
As you know, in the Russian language there are both independent parts of speech, and official. So, the first group includes just the participle from which the participle turnover is made up. Punctuation marks in para-participial circulation are regulated by the use of appropriate rules, which we will consider in the following paragraphs.
In general, this part of speech means, in fact, an additional action. Moreover, it refers to the main action described in a specific piece of text. And one more thing: punctuation marks in the participle and adverbial participles are put in the same way.
What combines the participle?
It combines the features of two parts of speech at once: a verb and an adverb.
What is there in the participle from each named part of speech?
From the verb to the participle “got” such signs as type and pledge, recurrence. And from adverb, the participle “inherited” immutability, as well as the syntactic role that is characteristic of the circumstance.
What questions does the participle answer?
This part of the speech answers the following questions: “What are you doing?”, “What are you doing?”
Introduction to participles
What is the solitary participle in the Russian language, we have already found out. But what is the whole structure? Punctuation marks in the participle turnover can be placed in different positions, according to the rules.
The design is a system of solitary germs and dependent words that are with him. The remaining parameters for the turnover remain the same as for the single germs. This is primarily about the questions to which it answers, as well as about its role in the proposal. Punctuation marks in sentences with participles can stand in several positions.
Suppose the sentence contains this part of speech. Then in the same sentence there must be a predicate expressed by a verb. It will denote the main action taking place, while the gerimony or the participle revolution will supplement this action with some, if you like, explanations or clarifications.
Participial turnover. Punctuation marks in adverbial turnover
It should immediately be said that the punctuation marks will have some nuances. There are some algorithms that will allow you to understand in most cases. However, sometimes the rules become powerless in the case of those proposals when, it would seem, the comma should be, but in fact it is not. Only intuition can help here, because such cases cannot be explained in any way. But we will deal with this later, and now let's talk about something else.
Using the participial revolution, a person must clearly realize that in this case the main action (expressed by a verb, whose role is the predicate) and the additional action (expressed by our beloved participial revolution) are related to the same person.
It is worth noting the fact that such constructions often take place in single-component sentences of a definitely personal type. Moreover, the predicate in such a sentence can be expressed by a verb standing in the imperative mood. This, by the way, means that the subject in the sentence will be quite easy to find.
Another caveat: you can use the adverbial turnover in impersonal sentences. At the same time, he will have a connection with the infinitive verb.
Examples of participles in sentences
1) Quietly, almost squatting to the very ground, he passed by, not taking his eyes off the object of his observation.
2) They swore for a long time, using sharp words that didn’t have the best meaning, and then she left, slamming the door slamming goodbye.
3) And who would have thought that, having finally decided to put his room in order, he would find something that he had been missing for so long, which he had almost forgotten about?
4) Seeing a pack of dogs, the cat did not just climb a tree - she almost flew up at him.
5) Having let out puffs of smoke from under the wheels , the car abruptly scratched the asphalt with tires and, with a long roar, made a quick leap forward.
Punctuation
Punctuation marks in adverbial circulation are placed in various cases. Their use is governed by rules and exceptions. Usually they depend on where the sentence is involved in the sentence. Punctuation marks in case of participial turnover can be placed on one side (if the turnover is located at the very beginning or end of the sentence), on two sides (if the turnover is located in the middle of the sentence), and also may not be put at all (if there is an exception to the rule).
In general, many sources say that the turnover is always isolated, in any position. This is not true, since there are exceptions, as well as some points that prohibit the punctuation marks in participial cases. They are few, no doubt, but they are still there. We will try to further figure out what these cases are.
When does the participle turnover not stand apart?
Punctuation marks in the participle turnover do not take place if the turnover itself merges in meaning with the main action. And when you can not use it?
First, if the primary and secondary actions refer to different words. Example: “Having run the distance faster than anyone, the shoes of the finisher have become unusable.” Such a proposal, or rather, the use in this proposal of this participle turnover will be a violation of syntactic norms. Compare this sentence with the following: “Having run the distance faster than anyone, the finisher soon celebrated his triumph.”
You can’t use the participle and the participle turnover if the infinitive is absent in the impersonal sentence. That is, at the same time, there is simply nothing to be attributed to the design. At the same time, in such a sentence there may be a combination composed of a pronoun or noun, which plays the role of a complement and a verb-predicate. Example: “Looking at the weather outside, I was immediately sad.” This is also a violation of syntax. It will be correct in this case: “Looking at the weather outside the window, I immediately became sad.”
It is forbidden to use the construction if it relates to participles of the passive kind. It turns out that the subject of the action, which is indicated by the gerimony, and the subject of the action, which is expressed by the predicate, do not coincide. Example: “The ball, having flown away from the stadium, was nevertheless caught.” The mistake here is that one turn refers to the flown away ball, and the second turn refers to the people who caught it.
Conclusion
So what did we find out during this article? First, that the punctuation marks in sentences with participles can be put in different ways, depending on its location in the sentence. That is, they can stand on one side (if the turnover is located at the beginning / end of the offer), and can stand immediately on two sides (if the turnover is located in the middle of the offer). Secondly, punctuation marks in the gerupunion and the gangbang turnover are set the same. Thirdly, the punctuation is regulated by syntactic rules. Fourthly, I would like to finally note the similarity of the production, which the punctuation marks have in the participle and participle circulation.