Agreed or Agreed: How to write? In what cases is it written "agreed", and in which cases - "agreed"?

The question of how to spell the word: “agreed” or “agreed” is related to the rules for spelling participles and adverbs. Both options are correct, but the choice depends on which part of the speech is meant.

“Agreed” or “Agreed”?

We have two sentences before us: “We acted in concert.” / “The decision of the meeting is agreed with the management.” We see that in the first case the word has two letters n , and in the second one. Why? The fact is that in the first sentence the word “in concert” answers the question “how, how?” and manifests itself as an adverb. In the second sentence, to the word “agreed”, we ask the question “what has been done?”, It appears as a short communion. And here the spelling laws already apply for each part of speech separately. Let's figure it out.

Letter n in short participles

This part of speech has characteristics that combine it with both the adjective and the verb. The ability to have a real and passive voice, as well as the participle time, is borrowed from the verb, and it takes the ability to have a full and short form from the adjective. In the case when we found out whether it is right - “agreed” or “agreed” - to write a word, we used a sentence with a brief passive participle in the past tense: “The decision of the meeting (what was done with it?) Was agreed with the leadership”. There is a rule for such participles: we write them with one letter n . Examples: an article is read, a session is completed, a feed is viewed, a stop is marked, etc. Communion of the middle kind, which are used in impersonal sentences: “The room was smoked,” also has one.

For participles, which are used in full, other rules apply. Let's consider them too.

Double n in full participles

In this way the participles are written with the suffix and the ending -owed, -owed: tinted windows, spoiled baby, spat on the floor, uprooted birch, purchased vase, resolved example, friend met, agreed proposal, etc.

The condition for doubling n

Not always, however, the same word is spelled the same. There are a number of conditions that affect the presence or absence of the second letter n in the participle or verb adjective.

In the sacraments we write -nn- if there are dependent words next to it: an ironed blouse; clipped hair; laden to the eyeballs composition, sill painted the day before yesterday, badly wounded soldier, etc.

But in the same words we will write -n- if the dependent words are absent: ironed blouse; cropped hair; loaded composition; painted window sill, wounded soldier.

Double n in adverbs

“Agreed” or “Agreed” - how do you spell it correctly when it comes to dialects? The following rule works here.

• Those dialects that end in -o and come from passive participles and adjectives containing -nn- are also written with the double letter n . Well, those adverbs that came from the words with -n-, respectively, have one n . Examples: which? - excited / how? - excitedly; which one? - confident / how? - confidently, etc. In exactly the same way, one can explain how it is spelled “coherently”: from the passive participle “coherent” this dialect received “double inheritance”.
• If an adverb arose from an adjective with one n , then it will have it only one: which? - confused / how? - confused; which one? - okay / how? - okay, etc.

What are agreed definitions?

A definition sentence is a sentence in which there is a minor member answering the questions “which, which, and whose?” For example: "In the garden (what?) A fragrant flower has blossomed." The word "fragrant" here is a definition. This definition is consistent, that is, it is consistent with the noun “flower” in the gender (masculine), number (singular), case (nominative). By the way, the definitions are combined with tokens that characterize the way of adjacency and control, but we are not talking about them now. We found out what a consistent definition is.

Separation in grammar refers to punctuation and intonation of certain words or syntactic constructions. Agreed definitions are also singled out. In what cases?

Separation of agreed definitions

The definitions that are expressed by participles with dependent words, if they are located in the sentence after the word being defined, are traditionally highlighted with commas. Example: “Sounds flew from the bells, (what?) Filling me with a sense of heavenly sweetness and triumph .” This, in other words, is about the participle turnover, which acts as a definition. Here is another proposal with a separate agreed definition: "Travelers saw the temple (which one?) Built here last year , and with joyful surprise examined its slender white lines, gilded domes." We see here that if a common definition is placed inside a sentence, it is distinguished by punctuation marks on both sides.

Finally

Now we know that doubts about how to write are “agreed” or “agreed”, “organized” or “organized”, etc. - they are resolved simply: it is necessary on the question to find to which part of speech the word belongs, and act according to the rule for given grammatical units.