Users who leave feedback about faucetpig.com - a site that distributes bitcoins can be divided into four conditional groups. The Internet also found comments left by members of the referral program. This category of people cannot be assigned to any of the groups. Let's try to figure out what they say about this site.
Four opinions on the project
The bulk of online entrepreneurs working on the project under discussion divided into two opposite camps. In the forefront are people who declared the project fraudulent. The persons of the second group do not doubt the decency of the owners of faucetpig.com: payments to their wallets are made on time and in full.
The next largest team consists of users of the World Wide Web who believe that the project under discussion is only good for making pocket money. They believe that it is impossible to earn an amount sufficient to at least satisfy the minimum requirements.
So we got to the smallest category of users. They are outraged! They are angry that there are no contact numbers and email address on the site. Moreover - the site is not added to the DMOZ directory (link registry) and this is also very suspicious.
The Internet also found reviews about faucetpig.com left by members of the referral program that do not fall within the description of the above categories.
Partnership features and the birth of new ideas
It can be assumed that the translation of this English-language site was incorrect: some (the fewest) online entrepreneurs report that their concern was caused by the lack of an affiliate program. Although this does not prevent other users from actively participating in the recruitment of referrals and creating affiliate content.
It is impossible not to mention one more fact. Especially advanced web users have figured out how to make money for sure thanks to the project under discussion: create your own website, on the pages of which carry out explanatory work. Explain to others how faucetpig.com works, how to use the tools provided to cryptocurrency miners by the project organizers, how to properly fill out a personal page, how to work more efficiently, and so on.
Interesting details
Users who already have negative experience on the site under discussion warn others about the need to beware of this tap. The work is simple (it consists in the selection of captcha), but it is impossible to withdraw earnings. The amount is sent to processing, where it is located for a very long time ...
The discussion of the reasons for this attitude towards bitcoin miners gave rise to only one version: perhaps the total amount (including commission fee) of the minimum amount of Satoshi earned to be withdrawn significantly exceeds the amount that the user plans to pick up.
According to another version, the delay in payments is the result of an increase in the minimum amount that a cryptocurrency miner can withdraw from faucetpig.com. User reviews suggest that the exact figure is known to few, but if you believe unverified rumors, we are talking about 3000 Satoshi.
There is also a third version, according to which scammers have settled on the site, who have the ability to vary the “minimum” depending on how much a particular participant has earned. People who have earned the required amount of Satoshi are shown a new amount in excess of the previous "minimum".
If you recall how much Satoshi is in bitcoin and take into account the fact that the necessary amount of cryptocurrency can be earned in two to three days, this is the option that looks most plausible.
How much bitcoin miners actually earn
If we assume that the information published on one of the advertising content is reliable, the crane pays 1,000 Satoshi hourly (another member of the "referral" promises that the miner will earn the same amount in five minutes). The referrer receives 50% of the referrals income, and the minimum amount to be withdrawn is 50,000 satoshis.
Knowing how many Satoshi are in Bitcoin (and this is neither more nor less than 100,000,000 Satoshi), one can assume: either the desire to quickly recruit a team made some referees forget about the obligations stated in the offer, or the project is really fraudulent.
Oddly enough, but there were users who claim that they have repeatedly transferred earnings to their virtual wallets.
Who knows: faucetpig.com pays or not?
People who report that they have repeatedly had the opportunity to pick up the Satoshi they earned still have it.
Some cryptocurrency miners working on faucetpig.com (the reviews of these users are freely available) and who did not want to disclose their real names, claim that they really received payment. True, one of them earned money once (after which the payments stopped), and some were lucky to do this several times.
Information was found on the Internet according to which the accounts of about half of the bitcoin miners who received several payments were banned for unknown reasons. If you believe these evidence, before the ban payments were made regularly.
When can a user be banned?
Each web project has its own laws. However, there are rules that everyone adheres to.
For example, a post or comment, the content of which users of the site may find offensive to themselves, may cost the trouble maker a many-day ban.
For a long period of time, a spammer (intrusive advertising letters that are not needed by the addressee) can also be banned.
Why else do site administrators usually block user accounts? For flood (meaningless endless messages on forums and chat rooms), constantly repeating advertising links, as well as texts containing praise for competing projects (repeated advertising posts or comments).
A minor ban threatens for the following actions:
- Creating a post already present on the site. On many projects, the user creating the new post sees a list of similar posts already posted by other participants.
- Create a post whose title does not reflect the summary of the message. These "tricks" are resorted to by bloggers who published an article, but suddenly noticed that someone had already covered the chosen topic.
- Incorrectly designed post (meaning tagging).
- Plagiarism (misappropriation of other people's texts).
- Political post without a corresponding.
- Incitement to a hacker attack.
- Call for violent action.
- A post or comment containing pornography.
- Images of injuries and remains.
- Distribution of other people's personal data (secret information, photos and links to personal pages of other users).