What is morphological analysis? At school, it is often called "analysis in parts of speech", because the purpose of this work is to determine the morphological form of the words that make up the sentence, their syntactic role.
Morphological analysis of words in isolation from the context is impossible: they should be considered exclusively in context. Therefore, you can probably often hear the expression "morphological analysis of the sentence", although the expression is incorrect.
Parsing a sentence can only be syntactic. A complete parsing of a sentence is an analysis of the units that make up the sentence: phrases and words. It is carried out according to a strictly defined scheme. First determine what the proposal is for the purpose of utterance. This is not difficult to do: you just need to understand why this sentence is being uttered. If to get an answer - it will be interrogative. In order to force someone to act - incentive. The remaining sentences will be narrative. Textbooks offer another, more complex, and more academic way of defining this characteristic.
When determining emotional coloring (exclamation or non-exclamation), students usually look to see if the exclamation mark is at the end . This is not the most accurate but acceptable way. The type of emotional coloring is determined by the emotional intensity of the proposal.
To determine whether a sentence is simple or complex, all its grammatical foundations are found.
Analysis of a simple sentence continues with a description of its basis. It is the main members of the proposal that determine what it is. If both are present, then we have a two-part sentence, if only one - a one-part sentence.
A one-part sentence immediately determines the type. Here it must be remembered that in the case when the main members of the sentence are expressed by only one subject, the sentence is considered inviting. (Morning. Sky. Silence).
If the sentence has a predicate but no subject, then the type of sentence is determined by the form of the verb-predicate. If the predicate is represented by the verb 1 or 2 persons, if it is clear from whom the person is speaking, then the sentence is definitely personal. (I'm waiting for you and love you very much.)
If the main members of the sentence are represented only by the predicate in the form of the verb 3 persons of the tense of the present or future, the verb in the past tense (plural), if the action is put forward in the first place within the meaning of it, then the sentence is considered indefinitely personal. (There was a knock on the window).
Sometimes the action referred to in the sentence may apply to all subjects at once. Usually this happens in proverbs, stable terms. These are generalized personal offers. ( They consider chickens in the fall. They wash the windows with ammonia). The verb in this case is in the form of 3 plurals.
Finally, the main members of a sentence can be represented by a verb that denotes an action that is performed without the participation of the subject. These are impersonal sentences. (Ringing in ears. It is getting dark).
Once the type of proposal has been determined, it is necessary to determine whether or not there are secondary members in it, to decide whether it is common or not. Usually, in a full analysis, it is required to indicate the characteristics of each member of the proposal. At this stage, they find out whether the supplement is indirect or direct, whether the definition is agreed or not, and the type of circumstances is determined.
After that, it is indicated whether there is a complication in the sentence and which one (i.e., is there an appeal, introductory words, are there homogeneous terms).
After that, it remains to draw a proposal diagram. It must be indicated on it the basics and the members complicating the proposal.