With the beginning of the summer season, residents of the private sector and owners of suburban cottages have concerns regarding the improvement of the site adjacent to the house. In particular, in order for the site to have an attractive and well-groomed appearance, it is necessary at least to ensure that the grass on the lawns is always trimmed.
For this task, there are various equipment on the market of gardening equipment, among which the simplest device for combating grass is a motokosa. But despite its simplicity, you must make the right choice when buying, since each model has its positive and negative sides, and you should choose only from the model range of world famous manufacturers. For example, Stihl and Echo are world-famous manufacturers offering consumers high-quality products. It is difficult to determine among a wide range of products, which will be better than a motokosa. Customer reviews often help her choose the right one.
How to correctly navigate by reviews
As a rule, every person reads only positive reviews to find out which is better than a motokosa. This is wrong, since in any device there are also negative aspects that can cross out all the advantages. Indeed, regardless of the model, any motokosa performs its functions well, and its shortcomings are usually hidden from human eyes and are recognized only during operation. Thus, the reviews make it clear what exactly can be expected during operation from the model in question. And you need to consider both positive and negative sides.
Analysis of reviews about Stihl
Despite the wide popularity of the manufacturer,
Stihl motokosa reviews and recommendations rarely have negative, but still they are. For example, consider the Stihl FS 38 motokosa, which is popular among gardeners. However, as many users have revealed during operation, the motor resource of this model is small, since it is designed to work in small areas. In addition, this motokosa has reviews and that repair is too expensive due to the high cost of spare parts. Therefore, these negative aspects to a large extent cross out the advantages expressed in light weight, ease of operation and engine economy.
Echo Review Analysis
Japanese Echo scythes have excellent characteristics in all technical parameters. In most cases, about Echo-motokosa, reviews say that these are reliable devices that are not afraid of even the careless operation of negligent users.
For example, the Echo SRM-2305 SI motokosa suits everyone with its work, but not one case has been noted when the fishing line, which itself should be fed with a light blow to the head, stopped doing this. In some cases, when trying to correct the situation, the head generally failed. These are isolated cases, but they still were and also spoiled the wonderful advantages of this model. Consequently, this motokosa received negative reviews only in detail. However, it often happens that when summing up all the negative details, the acquired brushcutter does not suit the owner. They are especially noticed when there is something to compare with, for example, with similar equipment from a neighbor who does not complain about his work. That's even such little things affect what demand will have a motokosa, reviews of which have a similar plan. After reviewing negative reviews, it no longer seems as attractive in the eyes of the buyer as it was originally.
Thus, there is no ideal technique, but, guided by the reviews, you can understand what to expect from the chosen model and how to deal with these problems when they arise.