The essay "My attitude to Pechorin" has been asked to write for students at school for many years. And this is no coincidence. In Russian literature, for more than a century and a half, M.U. Lermontov entitled "Hero of our time." Why is it still not out of date? How can this work be useful for people at the beginning of the 21st century?
What are the features of "My attitude to Pechorin"? First of all, it should be based not only on personal feelings, but also on the analysis of the text, the actual material. A good job is an analysis of the causes and consequences of the actions of the protagonist. It is on it that the work "My attitude to Pechorin" should be built. Composition with examples, quotes, text analysis is rated much higher.
Relevance of the work today
Lermontov called his work very well, so the reader seemed to have already been warned in advance that the main character of the work is modern. The longevity of the novel indicates that this is indeed a great creation of Lermontov. It has already outgrown the scope of its era due to the fact that Mikhail Yurievich showed in it the main laws of human life, which operate at all times. The characters in the work ask the most important questions, solve not immediate, but eternal problems, over which humanity will reflect in the future. All this can be written in the introduction of the work on the theme "My attitude to Pechorin." An essay should outline the work being described.
Is heroic dedication inherent in the main character of the work?
First of all, the question of the meaning of life relates to eternal questions. After analyzing the work, we can say that his characters respond to him in very different ways. However, who can be considered the true hero of the work? Since the central place in the novel belongs to the image of Pechorin, it is safe to say that this word primarily refers to it. Can we consider him a man of outstanding valor and courage, committing selfless deeds? In the novel about his courage there is evidence - the story of Maxim Maksimych, who saw how he "went to the boar" alone. However, “exploits” and “selflessness” are concepts that have nothing to do with his life. The essay "My attitude to Pechorin" should also include evidence of this thesis. For example, Pechorin himself in a magazine, which can be considered his confession to himself, says that he did not sacrifice anything for anyone. This applies even to love. This hero loved himself exclusively, and if he was fond of another person, then again for his own sake, for his own pleasure. And the actions that can be called insanely brave: duels, the abduction of Bela, romance novels - can not be called feats in any way, since they brought great suffering or death to people.
Ax in the hands of fate
Pechorin himself notices this and says that he acts as a kind of ax in the hands of fate. He acts "always without regret," "often without malice." “Without malice” here means not under the influence of passion, not by accident, but prudently and coldly. “Without regret” - in it it is especially scary, because it testifies to indifference to human grief. Moreover, this is his usual state of mind: the icy desert, which under a layer of permafrost covers all life.
How Pechorin destroyed the fate of others
The protagonist was aware that he was the cause of many troubles and often even tragedies for people with whose life he was in contact. The main occupation of this person is to make others unhappy: Grushnitsky and Bela die, Princess Mary suffers severely, Bela’s father, who was hit by Kazbich’s hand, is a victim of treachery. Even Maxim Maksimych, showing friendly feelings for him, like no one else, is deeply offended in them. The life habitual for “honest smugglers” is destroyed, there remains only one blind boy, which also turns into a tragedy for him.
Why did Pechorin make people unhappy?
A logical question arises: "What purpose did these actions have? Why did he interfere in the lives of others and destroy them?" For my own pleasure, from boredom. In the essay, it can be mentioned that this statement makes Pechorin extremely unattractive, as well as dangerous to society. Only in order to get rid of boredom, he violates moral laws, goes against his conscience, even commits criminal offenses. At the same time, Pechorin does not feel guilty, justifying his behavior by the bad morals prevailing in society, which supposedly spoiled him.
The weakness and pride of Pechorin
However, as a strong organism does not hit the disease, external influences of a destructive effect on the soul, which has high morality and internal strength, will not have. From this we can conclude that the soul of Pechorin was in fact weak, not well rooted. This can also be noted in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." It is very interesting to write an essay on the work “A Hero of Our Time” - the author reveals the psychology of heroes very deeply. The terrible result has self-justification: Pechorin does not object at all to playing the role of an instrument of execution for people. Power over them like this hero, he loves to torment people. All these features are the result of terrible pride, which nevertheless does not give his soul peace, since Pechorin also does not experience happiness. He is haunted by the boredom of life, which languishes, prompts to meaningless adventures, and in the end Pechorin dies. He deserved it. Such a conclusion can be made in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." Lermontov’s work does not accidentally end with the hero’s early death. His life ends because there is nothing for this man to live, all the forces of his weak soul were expended on empty entertainments. He did not find in his existence a high meaning, which, by his own admission, he suspected of himself and said that for this he was given spiritual strength, health, and mind. Life was wasted in vain, not bearing fruit, without leaving a good memory of itself. And is that a hero?
In what sense is Pechorin still a hero?
However, we will not rush to conclusions and refuse him this definition. "My attitude to Pechorin" is an essay that should not be one-sided. Consider another meaning of the word. “Hero” also means a person who embodies the characteristics of an environment or era. This value also does not apply to Pechorin - it differs sharply from others. In the novel, he is alone. Only the following two meanings will suit this character: the hero as the main character and as attracting attention to himself. Lermontov himself clearly sympathizes with Pechorin. He admires his mind, knowledge of people, courage. It will only be a plus in your work if you note the attitude of Lermontov to Pechorin. The author was pleased with the composition of this image. The resulting hero has outstanding abilities. However, his death is inevitable - he is dead soul.
Pechorin is a hero of our time. In the life of people, little has changed since then. Just as there was little thinking about what we exist for, then the situation has not changed. The ideals of Lermontov time (fame, career, wealth) remain relevant now. The protagonist saw human shortcomings, which can also be indicated in the work "My attitude to Pechorin." The work can end with the fact that now many people follow the principle: "Live high!" However, few are happy among them, since only serving lofty ideals and goals, love for people, self-sacrifice for them, a sense of duty bring a feeling of fullness of life and happiness.
These are just the basic recommendations on how to write a work on the topic "My attitude to Pechorin" (essay). In the novel “A Hero of Our Time”, however, there are no unequivocal ratings. Therefore, you can argue with some opinions, submit your own point of view. "My attitude to Pechorin" (composition according to plan) is an interesting topic that can be developed for a long time.