Before putting forward a clear fact, a person usually builds a hypothesis ... or theory. What is the difference between these two concepts? Are these really synonyms, or is their meaning significantly different? Let's try to find out for sure how the hypothesis differs from the theory, as well as what is common between these two concepts. We will give a clear description of these terms and decoding, and then compare them.
Hypothesis definition
Both in ancient times and in the modern world, any scientific discovery, development or find originally exists at the so-called ephemeral stage. In other words, all this was initially preceded only by words, conjectures, and conjectures, in which the majority, as a rule, did not believe. They are perceived as a possible version, and not as a dogma, they are listened to, but not heard. Such mental activity, accompanied by endless conjectures and assumptions, is gradually formed into a hypothesis. It is clear that this is not just a set of thoughts, but a well-formed conclusion that can be correctly presented to the public. So, a hypothesis is a certain assumption, which is supported by knowledge and indirect facts, but requires further refinement. It is worth noting before we explain how the theory differs from the hypothesis that there is a difference between the last and the usual guess. Any kind of conjecture is a purely subjective thing, it is often found in everyday life, in the everyday life of every person. But the hypothesis is already a scientific version, supported by earlier developments and evidence of a particular truth.
Theory Description
Just note that the concepts of theory and hypothesis seem to follow from one another, and now you yourself will see for yourself. As already mentioned, a hypothesis is a partially substantiated conjecture that requires further evidence. It is after these evidence is found and fall into place that the illusory version turns into a clear theory. In other words, this is a hypothesis confirmed in practice and having a number of undeniable facts proving its correctness. There is another concept, which reads as follows: theory is the highest degree of scientific thinking, which, guided by logic, explains a chain of interacting facts, thus proving the nature of a certain object or phenomenon. It is already becoming apparent how the hypothesis differs from the theory, how these two concepts are formed and what is common to them. But we still summarize the necessary result.
Differences of concepts
The difference between theory and hypothesis is that the first is only a guess based on some distant fact or phenomenon that may be indirectly related to it. The second is a reliable fact, justified by experiments, practice, accurate dogmas and experiments. Predictive power is also how a hypothesis differs from a theory. With the help of the latter, one can predict the events, phenomena and conditions of objects. It is also worth noting that theory is a much more comprehensive and detailed concept. It is accurate, any word of it can be proved, moreover, it is almost impossible to refute it. The hypothesis is an incredibly shaky structure. It can be easily challenged, find rebuttals or truths that contradict its meaning.
Similarities
We figured out how the hypothesis differs from theory, and now let's find something in common in these two almost philosophical concepts. Obviously, each of them represents a certain version, which is based on other knowledge and past evidence. Both theory and hypothesis are not dogmas, these are only versions, possible scenarios, more or less accurate. If a hypothesis is the initial stage of a scientific discovery, then a theory is an intermediate one that precedes further factual evidence.