The main function of arbitration is to resolve disputes peacefully. The defendant can represent his interests in court on his own, or involve an experienced lawyer for a more successful and positive outcome. The arbitration lawyer is vested with a number of powers delegated to him by law. Under the procedural code, he is entitled to enter into a dispute with an opponent of his ward.
considered a legal representative in court, but there are still a number of restrictions on his admission.
1. A representative may not be a person who previously represented the interests of the other, the opposite side.
2. Work experience as a lawyer from the moment of graduation should be at least 2 - 3 years. The lawyer must be a registered person in the register of lawyers of the chamber corresponding to the subject of the Russian Federation.
3. A person representing the interests of the plaintiff must be at least 18 years old.
The lawyer must perfectly, to the smallest details know the legislation, be confident in his innocence, be able to interpret and argue the laws, firmly defend his position, not give in to emotions, pressure from the outside, act clearly and in the interests of his client.
In addition, the arbitration attorney must understand economic issues. In disputes related to tax collections, a specialist, among other things, must be well versed in tax legislation. When choosing a lawyer, it is important that he has a sharp mind and extensive experience in these matters in practice.
You need to choose a specialist, given the subject of your dispute and the side of the matter with which you went to court.
An important role is played by the appearance of a lawyer. Only a competent, highly qualified defender must take care of himself, scrupulous in terms of clothing, endowed with the right speech and impeccable manner of behavior. It is the respectable appearance of a person that speaks of his prosperous position in the field of jurisprudence and in these matters.
An experienced and sensible lawyer will not immediately guarantee you 100% success at the first meeting, since he knows from personal practice that in any case there are always pitfalls and any case is a struggle between two parties. It is also possible that his excessive confidence in winning a case involves a bribe, a fee that he wants to receive from you. It is unlikely that such a defender will persistently defend your interests in court, because the result of work is not so important to him, money is more important to him.
The concluded agreement on monetary terms is contrary to the law and can lead to a lot of trouble, financial loss for you and disappointment. It is better to choose a well-known college of lawyers, to inquire about the experience of a specialist, his work on similar problems. The initial choice of a poor lawyer, the mistakes made by him in court, will not be in your favor at all. To win the process, you need to approach the matter responsibly, seriously and deliberately.