It is believed that the propaganda of the promiscuity of intimate relationships, polygamy, promiscuity and other types of debauchery came to us from the West along with the sexual revolution that thundered in the second half of the sixties. It is possible that the âchildren of flowers" played a role in shaping modern views on the family throughout the world, but it is not worth diminishing the significance of Marxism in this process. The most striking manifestation of agitation for free relations between men and women was the âTheory of a glass of waterâ by Alexandra Kollontai, which was very popular among the youth of the twenties, and now almost forgotten.
Background
Marx defined the family as a way of preserving inheritance rights to acquired property. She, in her bourgeois manifestation, was stigmatized and called the instrument of enslavement of women. Supporters of emancipation who had nothing to do with communism looked at marriage in much the same way. Progressive theorists of various kinds, preaching universal equality, agreed in the 19th century that soon the concepts of âhusbandâ and âwifeâ would wither away as unnecessary. Under communism, property as such will disappear, therefore, there will be nothing to inherit, and fathers will not need to worry about whether their children are like them. In addition, families bring up egoists, and the new society will need people of a new type, free from obsolete views. The pedagogical function should ideally be socialized, like everything else. A woman will work on a par with a man and will in no way yield to him. The task of creating a new person received a completely concrete direction. A new woman will give birth to him, and society will raise him. Enlightened by the idea of ââequality, workers will not cook home dinners, eat (rather than eat) they will go to the kitchen factories, where they will be fed tasty and fully three times a day.
These are the theoretical foundations of "The theory of a glass of water." But the main thing that excites the curiosity of the layman, concerns another question. How will this happen under communism?
Labor bees
Remarkable satirical writers Ilf and Petrov, discussing the âbig and small worlds,â compared the folk achievements of the great construction projects and industrial development of the country with trifling foxtrotics, philistine claims to grace and philistine ideas about life. Among the attributes of backward thinking, they, along with dresser elephants, called the female armpits, obviously produced then, from the cork, called "Love of Labor Bees". Nevertheless, it was precisely Bolshevichka Kollontai who came up with to compare Soviet women with these working insects. âThe theory of a glass of waterâ is directly related to the concept of âlabor beesâ, who were once puzzled by finding a suitable drone for mating - they are busy with business.
The bearer of the idea and its personification
Alexandra Mikhailovna Domontovich was born in St. Petersburg in 1872. She received a very good education, albeit at home, but versatile. In 1893, she, of her choice, rebelled against the will of her parents, married V. Kollontay, a poor officer, but five years later left him, leaving him with a son. Her further biography is connected with the revolutionary movement. According to the memoirs of Ivan Bunin, who knew A. Kollontai, set forth in The Cursed Days, this woman had a two-faced nature, which was expressed in a tendency to change clothes. Here she is in a working scarf at a rally, and he ended, right there - a bath, a box of chocolates and sincere conversations with a friend.
Alexandraâs romance with the Bolshevik Dybenko was stormy, and each of the partners did not bind himself with a vow of fidelity.
Bolshevichka demonstrated remarkable diplomatic talents, although not without some curious incidents. She escaped the Stalinist repressions and died safely a year before the death of the âfather of nationsâ. "The theory of a glass of drunk water" became its most famous achievement, although there were many others.
The meaning of the theory
Now about the essence of Alexandra Mikhailovnaâs views on matrimonial issues. So, the âlove of labor beesâ is not directly related to the high feeling that bears this name. The concept "The theory of a glass of water" fits into two words: "wanted - drank." But there is no thirst, and it is not necessary. People of the future should satisfy their intimate needs without wasting time and emotions, without interrupting production activities if possible . Of course, these views were not expressed so primitively, the syllable was more refined, and the theoretical justification was impeccable, but the essence is approximately the same. Man was not even compared to an animal, but to a winged insect, for which the instinct of reproduction served as the main stimulating factor. The reproduction of similar individuals is also a matter of social utility, necessary and even necessary. A new woman, free from prejudice and conventions, was supposed to conceive children in this way. All people are equal, therefore, the choice of a father for future offspring does not matter. The youth of the twenties in their essence differed little from the modern one. Is it any wonder that the âGlass of Water Theoryâ was a huge success?

Opponents
Oddly enough, many of the leaders of the Bolshevik party, including Lenin, did not share Kollontaiâs views on the sexual issue. The proletarian leader himself did not deny the presence of thirst, but considered it impossible to quench it from any source currently available, for example, from a dirty puddle, and he made some demands on the cleanliness of the glass. âThe theory of a glass of waterâ was also objected to by Lunacharsky, who even wrote a critical article âOn Life ...â devoted to youth issues. The views of Kollontai were not fully recognized as Marxist, although they were not called absolutely hostile or harmful either. The brave Bolsheviks simply pointed out some difference between freedom and debauchery.
Supporters and abstentions
As already mentioned, the target social base of Alexandra Mikhailovnaâs views was mainly immature youth. It was somehow embarrassing for the Komsomol members to refuse their male comrades in intimacy, which they willingly used. But not only among the young members of the Communist International of Youth enjoyed the fame "The theory of a glass of water." Mayakovsky, the great proletarian futuristic poet, for example, lived a difficult life. And although he called in the windows of GROWTH ânot to imitate the bourgeoisâ and to the theater to take his wife âhis own, not another'sâ, he allowed himself some liberties. Other Soviet artists, sometimes elderly, did not lag behind the poet.
The use of theory by enemies of Soviet power
The overwhelming majority of the population of the former Russian Empire was not ready to accept the idea that seemed to Clara Zetkin and Alexandra Kollontai so progressive and attractive. âThe theory of a glass of waterâ, of course, found its adherents, but their enthusiasm for it was selective. Supporters of "quenching thirst", going "to the left," usually did not grant their wives and husbands the right to use it, philistinely observing the purity of their own family nest. Opponents of Bolshevism have repeatedly used this psychological feature of the Russian people, attributing to the Communists even vices that they did not possess. For example, a certain Uvarov, being a member of the nationalist Union of the Russian People, published a decree composed by him, allegedly issued by the Saratov Provincial Council of People's Commissars, which declared the general socialization of women and the right to use them to anyone. The same document was used for anti-communist propaganda by the Germans during the Great Patriotic War.

The Theory of a Glass of Water by Alexandra Kollontai Today
In Gorbachevâs times, a replica of a Soviet woman who declared the absence of sex in the Soviet Union caused a lot of laughter. Of course, she did not mean reproduction by direct division (compared to bees, amoebas increase the population even easier), but this phrase reflected the whole attitude to sexual problems in our country then. The fact that the upbringing of children (and adults too) was puritanical is indisputable. However, most people were mostly satisfied with this situation: the âGlass of Water Theoryâ in the USSR turned out to be unpopular, possibly due to the subconscious tendency of the people to Orthodox and family values, laid down by our glorious ancestors.