With an indisputable evidence base, it has been established that a person, all his life, has been engaged in what he studies. Therefore, the question of what a school is, the direct answer is life. It is impossible to teach a person anything by force. But you can train. But hacked information erodes faster than spilled air.
A free man learns deeper and more efficiently. Bondedness depresses primarily mental abilities. And it is understandable that some individuals in the field of their hobby achieve amazing perfection. And in the field of professional knowledge, which often feeds a person, he limps on two legs.
School is a place of free time
The lexical meaning "school" comes from the Latin language. This word means time that is free from the hassle of stuffing the stomach and satisfying the mortal body, i.e. this is leisure. What we have now is not always right to call a school. There are many unreasonable limitations. Training is provided for those things that are needed only for those who teach.
And it is wonderful that pupils and students, often subconsciously, ignore everything, and this contradicts the natural necessity of a rational being to learn. If they try to format a person, then this action can be compared with a crime. The concealment of information, whatever it may be, is a direct theft of it from all of humanity.
A free intelligent creature can assimilate and process such volumes of information with amazing efficiency that it will take more than a millennium until such machines are created that in this aspect are equal to it. An example is any ordinary small child. For three years he assimilates in full the native language, and with it all the ethical standards of the people, and at the same time he never even sweats from mental work.
School must be a school
No one denies the great importance of the school in human life, but this is not the merit of the school itself. Young people are happy on their own.
And it is their inner worlds that fill the grayness of modern school life with that special atmosphere, which is then remembered with tormenting nostalgia. The idea of ​​gathering children in one place and passing on to them the experience of mankind was great. Just do not need to filter knowledge and say at the same time that young people will not understand. They live. And they decide what is good and what is bad. After all, what is a school? This is an island where a blossoming youth has gathered among an ocean of fading lives, which, in fact, are needed only for the ovary to appear on these flowers.
Educational proforma
Modern school curricula are not outdated, worse: the principles of their construction are incorrect.
Great Russian literature, as an example, after studying at school causes people to feel nauseous. In a large, almost a millionth city, two copies of Pushkin's works were bought in a bookstore for a year. One - "The Tale of the Golden Cockerel" with drawings; the second is The Queen of Spades without drawings. And the city is reading. This is a school…
Lack of paradoxes
When our whole society realizes the meaning of the word school, then the strange and outrageous paradoxes will disappear. A person who dreams of being a cook all his life should work as a cook, not a literary critic. It is necessary to give young people the opportunity to be educated, and not to educate them as they themselves do not see in the future.
The biggest paradox is that, having lost the meaning of the word “school”, we are trying to raise its authority. The whole generation, trained in the 60s, 70s and 80s, in the changed economic conditions did not find itself in life. And it was precisely those who were on the sidelines who studied at school well and excellently. And the three-yards, on the contrary, adapted, since they didn’t very diligently assimilate unnecessary information, their mind remained uncomplexed. Paradox - the potential of the most capable and diligent students is ruined. It's good? Does society have an understanding of what a school is? And why is it even invented by humanity?
Let the person learn what he loves
Our media sometimes laugh merrily that in America forty to fifty percent of the population does not suspect that the planet Earth revolves around the Sun, have not heard of Galileo Galilei and Giordano Bruno. And Zadornov supports them in this, calls Americans fools and even idiots.
He still lives in the old concepts of what a school is. He himself would really learn, ponder and understand that in fact there are no stupid people. You need to have in your head only what you want yourself, and not stuck by order.
Should education be compulsory?
To a farmer who loves his land and sees the field flat, it is unnecessary to explain that the Earth is round, that amphibrachium differs from anapest in this and that. And they explain to us, and then they don’t know how to return people to the village so that the fields do not overgrow with weeds. Everyone rushed to throw amphibrachs, even those who knew how to talk with Burenki without any additional training as people. And why? Yes, because even the word "collective farmer" itself causes associations with an inferior person in public consciousness. And this is not true. Knowledge of a living organism is very valuable.
Having returned to school exactly the purpose that it originally had, our country will turn the wealth of nature with the talents of our people into such prosperity that it will conquer the whole world even without bombs. In any case, I really want to believe in it.