The Russian diplomat, state adviser and Russian classic A.S. Griboedov served in the East and was nicknamed the Persians Wazir-Mukhtar. He was killed in the winter of 1826 in Tehran by Muslim conspirators. However, his murder was being prepared in Russia, which was frightened by the Decembrist uprising. Griboedov was not among them, but he was no less feared than those nobles. His great work “Woe from Wit” was forbidden and passed secretly from hand to hand. The death sentence was signed when an opposition diplomat was sent on a mission to Persia. So society got rid of a brilliant personality. However, his play remained alive.
What conflict determines Chatsky’s clash with society
The play “Woe from Wit” was based on a conflict between a young and progressive nobleman Chatsky and high society. The plot describes the events of one day in the house of the old aristocrat Famusov. Despite such a narrow time frame, the author painted a detailed picture of the events. He showed everything that is new and young that arose in the depths of the noble society.
Chatsky became a representative of modern youth of the "present century" with freedom-loving views. His opponent in the definition of "the past century" was a man of the old formation Famusov and his invited guests.
Now let's try to speculate a little about what conflict determines Chatsky’s clash with society.
The atmosphere of Famusov’s house
It may immediately seem that Chatsky is biased in his judgments about past and present tenses , he believes that the light is no longer the same, and his manners are too outdated. All this is due to his youth and to some extent naivety. Of course, Chatsky had lived abroad for three years, and now it is difficult for him to understand the atmosphere that reigned in Famusov’s house. He was waiting for some changes. However, when he returned, he realized that secular customs, alas, remained the same, and people were still revered for their ranks, the number of serf souls and money, and not for their personal qualities, intelligence and nobility. Now, in some aspects, it becomes clear which conflict determines Chatsky’s clash with society.
Generational dispute
From the very first pages of the work it is already becoming clear that this house is constantly lying. Here are just the lies of Liza’s handmaid, which is of some noble character, since she thus saves her mistress, Famusov’s daughter, Sophia, who is in love with Molchalin, father’s secretary. But, according to her father, he is not a couple to her, as he is very poor.
Sophia's lies are also justified because of love for Molchalin. But after some time, we see the lie of Molchalin, who begins to flirt with a servant Liza. It is clear that he is having an affair with Sophia because of the benefits.
But Famusov is no better in this regard, he also secretly drags after the maid Lisa. And then in his dialogue with the guests he will say the following words about himself: “Monastic is known for his behavior.” Griboedov specifically devotes so much time to describing this whole situation in order to more accurately reflect the moral atmosphere of the life of that society.
And Chatsky became the most serious opponent of old Famusov, the conflict of their opposing views on simple things gradually develops into a socio-political one. And the farther, the more difficult it is for them to find common ground.
Chatsky and Famus society. The writing
Famusov is a wealthy landowner, accustomed to do whatever he pleases, and therefore more deprived of moral goals. All that interests him in man is his position and condition. He doesn’t want to read smart books , since he considers this occupation to be very boring, therefore some statements characterize him as a person of near and superficial. In his views, he is conservative.
Chatsky, on the contrary, is a revolutionary man. He does not accept all those ideals that Famusov speaks of. On the question of which conflict determines Chatsky’s clash with society, this is precisely what can serve as the answer. After all, the protagonist exposes the most unpleasant features of the entire Famus society, which includes a lot of people. One of them is Colonel Skalozub, a careerist and a smug soldier, in front of whom Famusov is fawning, considering him a "golden bag."
The next character is Molchalin, who pleases meek and obedient behavior and uses the connections of people with the situation. Sophia and fell in love with his imaginary modesty. Chatsky considers him a complete fool and an empty man, in principle, like all the other guests present.
Revenge
Chatsky exposes everyone left and right; his main criterion by which he evaluates everyone is his mind and spirituality. Therefore, one can imagine what kind of conflict determines Chatsky’s clash with society.
The revenge of a cold-blooded stupid secular society was not long in coming. Chatsky opposed serfdom and was the bearer of advanced ideas - education and individual freedom. He wanted updates and a healthy society, but this did not happen. And then there comes a foreboding of Chatsky’s break with society, and he is declared crazy. Humiliated and insulted, he leaves this damned house and Moscow in horror.