Analysis of any concept should begin with a definition of terms. The meaning of the name is closely related to the implementation of the phenomenon in society.
What does “radical” mean?
This word is known from the school curriculum. Everyone knows that this term refers to the root. Removing it is a qualitative change. By analogy with the question of who the radicals are, the answer is: people striving for change. In fact, in politics everyone wants some kind of change. Radicals differ from other methods of achieving goals. They call for actions similar to rooting, swift and irreversible. In chemistry, such a term is also used. A free radical is an element unrelated to the rest. The analogy in politics is an independent, independent game, unwillingness to maintain ties with other forces. A characteristic of radicals is any lack of tolerance. Tolerate dissent is not their method.
Principles of Radicals
Change at any cost is their main idea. Radicals are people who do not want to put up with the existing order of things. Compromises do not suit them, they do not want to agree. There is nothing wrong with striving for a better life. On the contrary, it is very positive and useful. The bottom line is the methods. They can be smooth and painless, then the desired changes take place gradually, the society manages to rebuild and get used to other orders. There are also revolutionary methods when the old rapidly breaks down and creates new on its ruins. It is clear that the people at this moment suffer and suffer hardships. The latter type of action is characteristic of radicals. They act decisively, uncompromisingly.
Examples of radical action
Such a trend exists in almost any society. To better understand who these radicals are, we can consider a vivid example. During the well-known events in Ukraine, political forces showed themselves quite frankly. Thus, the radical fighters of the Right Sector acted not just decisively. At that moment, when other protesters were ready to compromise with the authorities, they announced their intention to bring events to a victorious end.
All the stated requirements of the Maidan by the President of Ukraine were satisfied. The protest seemed to run out of steam. There was not a single idea left to detain the people on the Maidan. And then the Right Sector appears, not going to leave the square! All confrontation proceeds to the next phase. The radicals of Ukraine did not abandon their intentions further. Following their ideology, they do not reckon with the existence in this rather big country of different views, positions, opinions. These are the general principles of this trend.
The danger of radical views
This trend is not limited to the demonstrative lack of desire to reckon with dissent. Discussing who the radicals are, it should be said about their attitude to the armed struggle. She is welcome, even more than that. The radicals consider armed resistance to power (the opposition, opponents and so on) the most effective method of conversation. To achieve the goal, all means are good. Automatic or fist, rocket or knife - everything applies. The opponent must not be persuaded, but forced.
In politics, the primacy of radical views in society inevitably leads to war. If the opponent is a different state, then to an aggressive state, if the inhabitants of his country, then to a civilian one. For example, the events in Libya clearly showed how right-wing radicals plunged the state into a devastating endless war.
Russian radicals
In a multinational country, extreme views always find suitable ground. Radical Islamists operate by methods of religiously motivated armed violence. The basis of Bachabism has become a wider Islamic movement - Salafism. Russian radicals, in fact, are part of this global trend. His fans are fighting for the return of all Muslims to the monotheism that their ancestors had. All other currents of this religion that arose later should cease to exist. Thus, the activity of the Wahhabis leads to the emergence of an atmosphere of religious intolerance in society. It should be noted that there is no unanimity in the movement itself. Some groups deny armed struggle, some consider it an extreme method. But the essence remains - their views do not recognize the existence of dissent, in this case, a different understanding of faith. Radical organizations did not immediately form their movement. It all started with small communities (jamaat).
They included mainly young people. Santada Bagauddin, a very colorful and charismatic person, inspired the jamaats. He urged not to recognize the official clergy, criticizing him for moving away from true Islam.
The basis of radical organizations
One of the main problems of all political movements is the recruitment of adherents, that is, adherents. Radicals attract their supporters by various methods. So, often Islamic movements attract people with the most sincere help. Representatives of such movements conduct missionary activities. They are engaged in explaining their views, including who the radicals are, what they are fighting for, and also provide humanitarian assistance to the most needy. It turns out that people living on the verge of poverty, and even dissatisfied with the power, risk joining the radicals. On the territory of developing countries, the selection of “agents” is carried out by various funds. Basically, it goes unofficially. Unfortunately, the development and financing of such movements often has goals that are not ideological at all. For example, Islamic radicalism in Russia was created with a very readable task: to undermine the country's economy in the direction of the Caucasus.
The level of development of modern society allows us to abandon the methods of extreme radicalism. More often he is fond of young people who are not able to objectively assess the balance of power. Joining the ranks of the radicals, it is recommended that you well imagine that bloody riots are not the best way to make progress. They are permissible only when no other way exists. And, as you know, the walker is building the road. What to use: a word or an automaton, choose him - the creator of his life!