Major manufacturers of construction equipment, for the most part, are trying to expand their presence in the market, covering new niches and groups of goods. At the same time, the principles of highly specialized production are preserved. The companies Huskvarna and Shtil adhere to such tactics, releasing garden and logging tools of unsurpassed quality. This is not to say that the assortment of manufacturers ends here, but the basic directions of development fall precisely into these categories. One way or another, the average consumer in the process of choosing such an instrument will inevitably face a dilemma: which is better - “Calm” or “Husqvarna”? To solve this problem, you should familiarize yourself with the proposals of these companies, their advantages and disadvantages.
General information about manufacturers
The German company "Calm" was created in 1926 and from the very first years of its existence has been oriented towards the manufacture of forestry equipment. To date, the manufacturer has formed an extensive line of gasoline chain saws, as well as individual series of various garden equipment. The products of this brand are presented in Russia along with components, consumables and branded accessories.
As for the Huskvarna company, its history spans about 400 years. The first mention of it is associated with an arms factory, created in 1620 by decree of the Swedish king. In XX, the manufacturer is actively mastering the technology for the development of household goods, but subsequently pays most attention to the engines and designs of gasoline saws.
Which is better - "Calm" or "Husqvarna"? As you can see, both companies have considerable experience in creating chain equipment, but a number of unique developments should be immediately attributed to the advantages of the second manufacturer. In particular, it was the Huskvarna chainsaws that were the first to receive an anti-vibration system, an automatic chain brake and advanced carburetor regulation technologies. Another thing is that today almost all representatives of the segment use similar solutions.
Tool classifications
Several levels and signs of product classification should be distinguished:
- Application area. Both manufacturers produce household and professional appliances. In some categories, high-power industrial equipment is also offered as special modifications.
- Destination. In this part, you can divide the assortments into categories: garden, cleaning, household and abrasive cutting tools.
- Operating principle. Companies mainly specialize in manual equipment with engines, but Swedish designers are also successfully developing machines equipped with automation.
Now it is worth returning again to the question of which is better - “Calm” or “Husqvarna”? From the point of view of an ordinary homemaker, there will be no significant difference in terms of coverage of the directions of development of the tool. If we take the target groups of household gardening equipment, then both companies are represented in the same way, and in other categories like machine tools, Huskvarna, for example, is under pressure from competitors on the other hand.
Assortment of the company "Calm"
The main product is garden equipment. In particular, the interested consumer will find the following tools in the Shtil store:
- Chainsaws.
- Chain electric saws.
- Lawn mowers.
- Brush cutters.
- Trimmers.
- Blowers and vacuum cleaners (for the garden).
- Sprayers.
Particular attention should be paid to the categories of chain saws. The most popular are gasoline units, but for private needs in recent years, the company has been developing very attractive models of electric and cordless garden carvers. For example, which trimmer is better - Calm or Husqvarna? For about 13 thousand rubles. in the assortment of both companies you can find a decent model like the STIHL FS 55 with a two-stroke engine. The difference will be only ergonomic and aesthetic features - the shape of the handle, the length of the rod, adjustment of the structure, etc. Therefore, the choice should be made according to individual characteristics.
Assortment of Husqvarna
The Swedish manufacturer has a more extensive list of garden equipment. In addition to tools for caring for trees, shrubs and lawns, he also offers power equipment. In particular, this group is represented by mini tractors, raiders, motor pumps, cultivators, etc. For each transport unit, you can also choose branded attachments. But the central place in the assortment, of course, is occupied by chain saws in different designs. Which saw is better - "Calm" or "Husqvarna"? For example, you can compare models 240 and MS 180 C-BE, respectively. They are similar in performance, have the same power reserve of 2 liters. pp., but this is precisely the case when in direct competition "Calm" wins due to functional support. The MS 180 C-BE is equipped with a soft start system and quick chain tension, which is a must for mid-range chainsaws.
What are the manufacturers alike?
As has been noted more than once, manufacturers endow their models with approximately the same technical and operational qualities. In terms of power, structural device, range of functions, and even the elemental base, the tools are approximately the same. Of course, we are talking about a parallel comparison of models of equal levels - approaches to the segmentation of the same chainsaws from the initial household to high-performance professional class are approximately the same. And this applies not only to chain saws. Petrol scythes have similar characteristics. Which is better, "Calm" or "Husqvarna" in this niche? If we compare the FS 45 and 122C models (Calm and Husqvarna, which are identical in price (10 thousand rubles)), then they will correspond to each other in terms of power potential, technical part and tank volume with slight discrepancies.
Comparison of ease of use of the tool
The ergonomics of a modern tool are formed by two factors - design performance and functionality.
According to the first parameter, the models are almost identical. Manufacturers use a full range of tools to make the case and handles as convenient, compact and tenacious as possible.
In terms of functionality, everything will depend on the particular technological filling of the chainsaw. Which is better, "Calm" or "Husqvarna" on this indicator? Each company has its own set of options that increase both ergonomics and safety of using equipment. For example, Husqvarna equips the saws with its own Air Injection filtration unit, improves working comfort thanks to the LowVib anti-vibration system and simplifies the oil control process through an innovative feed regulator. As for Calm products, it is provided with an ElastoStart starter and Ematic's proprietary automatic lubricator.
In other words, preference for a particular company will need to be given based on specific requirements.
Reliability Comparison
Another parameter for evaluating the technique by which both manufacturers converge. Both Germans and Swedes pay a lot of attention to increasing structural strength. But this is achieved in different ways, so the technical nuances should be taken into account.
Which is better, "Calm" or "Husqvarna" in terms of reliability? In the first case, the manufacturer relies on design optimization. For example, the presence of automation can minimize the wear of small functional parts (in the same chain), and the removal of the tension device on the side of the housing reduces the risk of damage to the working bodies. As for the Huskvarna company, it is successfully experimenting with new alloys in construction - in particular, the crankcase is made from unique alloys of aluminum and magnesium.
That is, there is no obvious leader in this indicator, and again one should start from specific needs, since the new structural alloy and automatic control systems have a different effect on the operational process.
Price Comparison
In cost, the difference is also small. Some models are almost identical. Significant differences are observed only in the specific premium sector, where we are talking about chainsaws worth 30-50 thousand rubles. In segments up to 10 thousand rubles. and especially up to 5 thousand rubles. prices are the same, but sometimes there are differences in configuration. For example, which is better, the Shtil or Huskvarna trimmer in the segment up to 10 thousand rubles? In the first case, the equipment will be equipped with a mowing head and safety glasses, and in the second - with the same trimmer head, and instead of glasses, the user will also receive a set of protective covers and equipment for regulating the working bodies.
Pros and Cons of the Calm Models
As practice shows, the models of this line work well in the domestic sphere, when it is necessary to cope with the tasks of sawing thin logs, to prepare firewood or building materials. On the other hand, a lot depends on a combination of characteristics. If the model is compact and inefficient, then it is unlikely that it can cope with felling trees, regardless of the company - "Calm" or "Husqvarna." The best saw for allotments in the Calm segment is MS 361. This unit not only has sufficient power, but also contains a full set of protective options that insure the operator during the sawing process.
Pros and Cons of Husqvarna Models
This company is developing its own line of engines for chain saws, which gives it advantages in terms of developing high-performance models. There are almost no special claims to the reliability and durability of parts, which is a plus. However, in the middle segment, not everything is so obvious. For example, which is better, "Calm 180" or "Husqvarna 135"? Once again, the inexhaustible resource of the German piston system is combined with lightness. However, the Calm 180 model is more ergonomic and flexible in settings, which many Husqvarna units lack.
Conclusion
It can be clearly said that the two manufacturers in question deserve attention from consumers at different levels. But which chainsaw is better - "Calm" or "Husqvarna"? The equipment of both brands demonstrates significant advantages over other competitors in the general segment of garden equipment, and differs in details and small nuances. Moreover, comparisons of models at different class levels can reveal inverse pros and cons. The same functionality of the Shtil technology does not characterize its entire segment, just as the high operational resource does not determine the entire Husqvarna product line. Therefore, in each case of choice, a comparison should be made not only by brand, but also by model.