Issues and analysis of the story of V. Shukshin “Cut”

The analysis of Shukshin’s short story “Cut Off” is very important for understanding the work of this writer. And also in general, his author's worldview. Biographers know that the prose writer attached great importance to him.

The plot of the story

For a deep analysis of Shukshin’s story “Cut off”, you need to know that in the center of the story is the figure of Gleb Kapustin. This is a classic hero Shukshin. Echidna, funny and at the same time well-read peasant. He himself is from the village, but as he loves to argue with the townspeople, to measure their strength of intellect with them.

As part of the work of Shukshin, Konstantin Ivanovich comes to visit the old woman Agafya Zhuravleva. He is a successful university professor, Ph.D. His wife is also engaged in science. They have a daughter-schoolgirl.

Konstantin Ivanovich does not come to visit his mother empty-handed. He brings the things that, in his opinion, are necessary in the village. Among the gifts - a bathrobe, an electric samovar and wooden spoons.

Country people

When analyzing Shukshin’s story “Cut Off,” it is very important to understand how the author perceives the villagers. After all, they play one of the key roles in his works.

When analyzing the story of V. M. Shukshin "Cut", you can pay attention to the fact that he respects the villagers with great respect.

In this story, many characters who have received a good education, made a career and succeeded in this life. For example, one of them is a doctor, the other is a colonel, the third is a correspondent. And there are two more pilots.

One of the central heroes, Ph.D. Zhuravlev, also belongs to this category. When any of these people returns to their native village, a story about their present life is a must. At the same time, they go on communicating with the people with an open soul, noting in the fellow countrymen a sincere interest in themselves and their lives.

Provocateur Kapustin

In the analysis of Shukshin’s story “Cut off”, much attention is paid to the figure of Gleb Kapustin. From every meeting with a fellow countryman who has become urban, he arranges a real performance.

All night, he devotes only a single goal. Catch the arrogant, in his opinion, person on some mistake or inaccuracy. Ignorance of some important historical fact.

Central dispute of the story

In the analysis of the story “Cut off” by Shukshin, it is necessary to briefly pay attention to the dispute that occurred between Gleb and Zhuravlev.

They argue about who ordered the arson of Moscow during the Patriotic War of 1812. As soon as the reader finds out the topic of the dispute, he immediately begins to suspect that the denouement of the plot will be dramatic. Kapustin does everything to “cut off” the candidate of sciences Zhuravlev. The remaining villagers have long been watching such performances and are looking forward to every new performance.

At this time, the candidate of sciences himself does not suspect anything of the upcoming test. There is some ambiguity. Zhuravlev appears as a candidate of sciences and a candidate for another “cutting”. He is a victim who does not yet suspect what she has to endure.

The essence of the conversation between Kapustin and Zhuravlev

Describes in detail the essence of their conversation Shukshin. "Cut", a brief summary, the analysis of which is the subject of research by many literary scholars, gives an idea of ​​the author's worldview. Zhuravlev expects the conversation to go nostalgic - about childhood, the past of the heroes. However, Kapustin begins to actively touch on philosophical topics.

The candidate of sciences tries in every possible way to evade the conversation, makes attempts to laugh it off, but all to no avail. Kapustin sticks into it like a tick. He sees a clear task ahead - to prove that the opponent’s intellect does not reach the level of a candidate of sciences. So, he does not deserve the position that he received in society, he does not have the right to call himself urban. Kapustin seeks to prevent the urban people laughing at the provincials, who are in no way inferior to them in terms of intelligence, despite the fact that they are not marked by advanced degrees.

At a certain point, Gleb expressly declares his intentions. He says that he loves to click on the nose of the interlocutor, for the sake of this and starts controversial conversations.

It turns out that the names of the heroes are not random, but symbolic. Zhuravlev hovering somewhere in heaven, personifying the public elite, and Kapustin was never able to go beyond his own garden.

Who is right?

Reading the details of the dispute, the reader clearly understands all the wrongness of Kapustin. Moreover, both in form and in content. He turns to Zhuravlev lengthy tirades, which contain more indirect insults than common sense and rational sentences. This is a dispute for the sake of argument, not to establish the truth. He is also wrong from the ethical point of view, since he arranges the whole performance with a person whom he came to visit.

However, corrosive critics find a lot of common sense in the very position that Kapustin adheres to. Indeed, after discoveries and writing new books, pundits often forget about the national and public good, about the people for whose sake they all do it. Indeed, in an ideal world, any of their work should be aimed at improving the hard life of ordinary people.

The essence of the story of Shukshin

The problems of V. Shukshin’s story “Cut off” is to make society take a close look at the intellectual potential of an ordinary Russian person. Even if not burdened with awards and titles. This is what the work "Cut out" calls for. An analysis of Shukshin’s story emphasizes the need to establish insurmountable barriers to the so-called mass culture and pseudo-art, which spread intellectual wretchedness and bad taste.

In his story, Shukshin seeks to click on the nose of just those who are used to talking with an ordinary person from the people from a position of aristocracy and arrogance, boasting of their high position. The writer insists that the social status of a person imposes certain obligations on him, and not only gives benefits and privileges. A person who has achieved a certain position in society must invariably follow it. And in all respects. This is described on the pages of the work "Cut". An analysis of Shukshin’s story makes us think about how we relate and communicate with other people, and also remember that we need to grow professionally and creatively constantly. Since all the time to leave on the previous merits will not succeed.

Shukshin's position

Vasily Makarovich Shukshin - a bright Soviet writer who was always worried about the problems of the common people. His characters are residents of an ordinary village in the Soviet Union. Most of them are workers with a difficult and peculiar character. They are very observant and sharp-tongued. His words will not come back.

In the fate of many of these heroes there is a place for achievement. A vivid example is the character of one of his early works, Pashka Kolokolnikov. He appeared in the comedy melodrama "Such a guy lives," which was shot by Shukshin himself.

However, many clearly not of this world. They are almost called eccentrics in the eyes, the villagers do not understand their aspirations. Although the intentions of such heroes are simple, pure and naive, they do not fit into the pragmatic lifestyle of most Soviet peasants.

In general, the Russian village is one of the main characters of Shukshin. It is described concisely, but very deeply and capaciously. It can be seen that the author himself knows all the details and features of this life. Shukshin often brings to the forefront moral problems, as happens in the story "Cut off."