Let’s think - flying saucers, is this a real phenomenon from the point of view of academic science, and are there any reasonable explanations for such a phenomenon? First, recall what everyone has long known. Academic science proves the fact that any movement must be preceded by repulsion.
Otherwise, this fact is also called the “supporting” movement, in which the mass of a moving body, including one having a rotational movement, is repelled from another mass.
In closed systems, the sum of all external forces always remains unchanged. Simply put, the center of any movement that occurs on Earth and within its investigated orbits is the very middle of the globe. All objects and any vehicles known to the world today are subject to this law.
The fundamental laws on which all the interaction of masses in a confined space, such as the Earth, are based on, are Newton’s three laws, namely: the law of conservation of energy, the law of momenta and the law of angular momenta. With the correct interpretation of these laws, it cannot be concluded that the center of mass
closed space in which the rotational movement occurs, remains constant.
Is there an alternative kinetic energy of rotational motion, which is not based on the action of external forces, that is, is not "support"? Let's look at an example.
Suppose we have a cylinder, a small ball rotates around a cylinder in a conditional, very strong and weightless sphere. If you create an insignificant shock wave behind the ball (explosion), then according to Newton’s second law, the change in the speed of rotation of the ball must occur in proportion to the force acting on it (that is, the force of the explosion), and the movement should be directed along a straight line towards which the explosive force was attached.
What will happen in this particular example?
Newton’s second
law does not differentiate between translational or rotational. Therefore, the rotational and translational movement of the cylinder should be considered equal to the force applied to the cylinder. It turns out that a body rotating around an object can transmit translational and
rectilinear motion to this body
, the direction of which will coincide with the direction of the applied force.
This means that the rectilinear and translational motion of one object can cause the energy that the work produces during the rotational movement of another object. The cylinder, in our example, has a large mass, relative to the ball. If this were not so, then the movement of the central axis of the cylinder would be equivalent to the movement of a rotating ball. However, examining our example, we can assume that there is a right to exist such inertia at which the force applied to the center of the cylinder will cause a rectilinear and translational motion in it.
Thus, the rotational motion of one object can cause a rectilinear and translational motion of another, and all three of Newton’s laws will not be violated.
Modern science has already reached the point where it is able to create a “unsupported” engine that will use the continuous, closed and cyclical process of generating energy, which will create a rotational motion. This method of transportation can be used in any vehicle, from a bicycle to a flying saucer, and the economic efficiency of this process will not be comparable to anything.