Morality is a concept that everyone is familiar with. This is what a normal civilized society is based on. An unspoken moral law, not spelled out anywhere, but sacredly revered by a person. And what is immoralism? Does he characterize an immoral person? Does he have a place in philosophical movements? We invite you to speculate about this together.
Immoralism is ...
The word comes from lat. immoralismus, where in is not, moralis is "moral", "moral." Today, immoralism is an integral worldview position, which is the denial of all moral principles.
But if we look at the concept from the point of view of philosophy, then we will highlight here a completely different meaning. Immoralism is a critical type of thinking, independent of the reigning moral standards, which is an equal participant in cultural dialogue.
If we consider the term from a historical angle, we will see that immoralismus is that antithesis, invariant. She was a fairly powerful social force, having a considerable impact on society.
Let us also draw your attention to the fact that between immoralism and immoralism it will be absolutely wrong to put "equal." The last term means only unwillingness to follow social moral standards: both in general and only in certain situations.
The course of immoralism
Having examined what immoralism is, we briefly present its two main trends:
- Relative. Proponents of this trend believe that morality should not be an absolute dogma at all times. It changes over time, depending on the area of application, a particular society. In other words, obsolete moral standards need to be rethought.
- Absolute. Adherents of this trend completely exclude morality as such. Up to the fundamental differences between good and evil.
Immoralism and Philosophy
You already know the meaning of the word “immoralism” in a philosophical interpretation. Such an ambiguous belief system was characteristic of both its early and late forms. Let's look at specific examples:
- Relativism, nihilism, agnosticism did not exclude a number of positions of immoralism.
- In absolute form, it can be found in the teachings of skeptics, sophists. It is peculiar to the teachings of Nietzsche, Machiavelli, the early works of Shestov.
- Supporters of relative immoralism include the Stoics, Epicureans, Cynics, determinists of the New Age and Marxists.
As for Russian philosophy, here too it showed its certain identity. The followers of immoralism can be called L. Shestova, K. Leontiev. The relative course was supported by V. Ivanov, V. Rozanov, D. Merezhkovsky. The exclusiveness of the Russian understanding of immoralism is that philosophers suggested going beyond morality in order to know true being. For example, Shestov argued that God can be found only by leaving the boundaries of moral boundaries established by society.
Now we all know in general terms what immoralism is. The concept does not characterize a person who violates the moral laws of society. Its meaning is more philosophical, calling for a rethinking of moral principles, a detached view of them, rejection of these boundaries for the sake of a deeper knowledge of what is existing.