Ulyana Borisovna Skoibeda was born on October 20, 1975 in Moscow. Since 1997 he has been a columnist for Komsomolskaya Pravda. The world first heard about Ulyana as a journalist in 2009, when her article on corruption and the financial pyramids of the Ministry of the Interior was published. Then she was nominated for the Iskra Prize for this article. Four years later, for her scandalous note, the newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda issued a warning to Roskomnadzor. Then her replica caused a huge resonance. Many media representatives accused the journalist of manifesting anti-Semitism. While still a budding journalist, she covered the scandal that ultimately led to the resignation of Yuri Skuratov, Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation.
Conflict with stray dog advocates
Thanks to an article by Scoibeda Uliana, entitled “Kill! Himself! ”, The newspaper“ Komsomolskaya Pravda ”was included in the contenders for the anti-award“ Rotten shout ”. This award was established by Moscow animal protection organizations and was supposed to be awarded to those media that, in their opinion, supported dog hunters. By the way, dog hunters are people who, on their own initiative, are engaged in capturing wild animals on the streets of the city and their killing.
No less well-known article by Ulyana Skoibeda - “Why do we learn the Russian language from Israeli citizen Dina Rubina?” She wrote it before the Total Dictation in 2013. The point of view of the journalist was supported by Viktor Toporov, but there were also those who again discerned notes of anti-Semitic mood in the article. However, Ulyana Skoibeda said that the article was about citizenship, not nationality.
Lampshades from the ancestors of the liberals
Another work that resonated was where she regretted that the Nazis did not make lampshades from the ancestors of the liberals. This article was printed in 2013 in the same Komsomolskaya Pravda. Her article was a response to the words written on Leonid Grozman’s blog about the USSR intelligence counterintelligence organization SMERSH, which he equated with the SS troops. Despite this, it was in the words of the KP journalist that they read the "anti-Semitic trick." A warning was issued to Komsomolskaya Pravda, and Skoibeda's words were removed from the electronic periodical. After that, the journalist herself made a public apology for the incorrect statement in the direction of the relatives of the opponents. Ulyana Skoibeda, whose biography is bright enough, first admitted her mistake, but did it ambiguously and caused a resonance. At that time, these events scattered quite loudly, not only in Moscow. The deputy mayor of the capital, Leonid Pechatnikov, expressed his opinion on this subject, who recalled that his grandmother was a victim of genocide and refused to answer further questions from KP correspondents.
Resonant personality of Ulyana
Despite the fact that a lot of criticism fell on Ulyana Skoibed, the editor-in-chief of the Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper not only did not intend to fire her, but even defended her. He urged to deal with the statement of Leonid Gozman that the Soviet SMERSH not far from the Nazi SS.
From the point of view of Vladimir Kara-Murz, Scoibed’s apology was more like defending his opinion than an apology. Another journalist, Pavel Lobkov, parodied a journalist in his regular column “Lobkovskaya Propaganda”. After this hype, according to Ulyana, she was threatened several times with physical violence by nationalists.
Through the eyes of FSB officers, Scoibeda talks about Beslan
What Ulyana Scoibeda thinks about Beslan? This could be seen on the Facebook page, where she posted an interview with security officials who admitted that the special operation could have taken place with fewer victims. Local residents prevented them, who ran to the school with weapons. I must say that these interviews could only kindle a fire between two grieving peoples who survived the tragedy. The names of the interviewees in this article were not disclosed, and only their posts were signed. So, according to an officer of the FSB of Ingushetia, during the seizure of the school, a lot of fathers and relatives of the children stood near the school with weapons. They did not fulfill the requirements of the FSB officers, thereby interfering with the planning and conduct of the special operation. According to them, as a result of the operation, some security officers were shot in the back, which means they were shot outside.
Interview with FSB officers
According to another employee of the central FSB apparatus, the assault was launched by security forces not because of an explosion, but because terrorists put forward impossible demands to end the war in Chechnya. They also could not openly launch the assault because the parents of the children who were in the school became a shield on the way of the special forces. Undoubtedly, even 11 years after this event, this interview could not but resonate in society. There are those who sided with Ulyana, thanks to the truth that opened, while others accused of fomenting conflict between peoples.
"Chronicle of the death of Germany"
This is another high-profile article written by Ulyana Skoibeda in KP. The "Chronicle of the Death of Germany" at the moment consists of three parts. It begins with the fact that Ulyana receives information from a compatriot from Kazan, Galina Ivanovna. She is already a naturalized German, first married in Germany, then divorced and was about to confirm her higher education diploma, and then find a job. However, according to her, all plans were broken up on the illogical actions of the country's government. In her letter, almost all information is confirmed by specific links to various German media. Her diary is from January 1 to August 2015.
In the first part of the chronicle, Galina Ivanovna talks about how it all began and what the government is doing so that immigrants arriving in the country feel at home. Naturally, at first this may seem very noble, but only with respect to refugees, and not to indigenous people.
Arriving in the country do not always behave as people should, to whom they provide everything possible in a foreign country. The second and third parts of the article describe the actions that took place from September to August and were most intense for Germany in 2015. In this article there is no sentence written by Ulyana Skoibeda. The “Chronicle of the Death of Germany” reflects the opinion of another person, but the journalist’s attitude to what is happening is clear.